I couldn't give a flying __ if it was 80+ bass they were taking homed2FISH wrote:they Wouldn be so smart and smug if it was Bass they were taken in number's
They will still be eaten not wasted
Moderator: donal domeney
I couldn't give a flying __ if it was 80+ bass they were taking homed2FISH wrote:they Wouldn be so smart and smug if it was Bass they were taken in number's
You can quote all the common sense stats ya like, if it was a mark that you fished every Summer for the last 30 years and you couldn't any more because of the dangerous carry on by BASHERS half loaded on cheap vodka; I would imagine you'd have a different point of view.[/quote]danbrosnan wrote:Ya I agree people are entitle to keep as many mackerel as they want, regardless of who they are, rod and line will not do any damage, it's commercial trawlers doing damage... Common sense..MONKEYwrasse wrote:They are more than likely put to good use its not like they are wasting themdanbrosnan wrote:?
What if they were ray Shane lolShaneH wrote:I couldn't give a flying **** if it was 80+ Bass they were taking homed2FISH wrote:they Wouldn be so smart and smug if it was Bass they were taken in number's
They will still be eaten not wasted
paul skelly wrote:What if they were ray Shane lolShaneH wrote:I couldn't give a flying **** if it was 80+ Bass they were taking homed2FISH wrote:they Wouldn be so smart and smug if it was Bass they were taken in number's
They will still be eaten not wasted![]()
![]()
if its bass then they are breaking the lawShaneH wrote:I couldn't give a flying **** if it was 80+ Bass they were taking homed2FISH wrote:they Wouldn be so smart and smug if it was Bass they were taken in number's
They will still be eaten not wasted
STOCKINGShaneH wrote:I couldn't give a flying **** if it was 80+ Bass they were taking homed2FISH wrote:they Wouldn be so smart and smug if it was Bass they were taken in number's
They will still be eaten not wasted