Tope threat. Keep an eye on your waters.

This forum is for general discussion related to Angling. Areas covered would include Media Reports, Conservation Issues and the promotion of the sport.

Moderators: kieran, Tanglerat, teacher

Tope threat. Keep an eye on your waters.

Postby gowerray » Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:52 pm

Off topic title I know but I think people need to hear about it.
A Fish Merchant Company in Lowestoft on the North Sea coast of the UK have come up with a brilliant plan to diversify. They are opening up a market for Tope from the Long-liners (well most of the regular species have gone). If it catches on we could well see yet another species become extinct in a very short time simply because of greed. You can read the full story on the Sea Anglers Conservation Network page here:
http://www.anglers-net.co.uk/sacn/lates ... p?view=326
Apologies for using the 'Shore Angling' board of this great site but I had to get it out :x
Ray
gowerray
 

Advertisement

And after the fish have gone

Postby x » Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:49 pm

Sounds like another barking and dangerous idea, as if shark fisheries are sustainable given how long spurdog lasted after they became 'comercially viable'. Doubtless if left unopposed, when the tope are history, these cretins will find some justification to start on something else. Perhaps seal meat? Or how about ready to eat shrink wrapped roast seagull?

Maybe when there's no marine life left, surfers and divers will become fair game.........note to self - stand back from the edge when fishing....
x
 

Postby dtmcc » Sat Jun 25, 2005 2:58 pm

thats the fishing for you.............
till hell and dam tomorrow, lets make a pound today...... even if we left the tope to chatarter skippers who could / do bring more money into the community.....but then!!!!!!! a professioal fisher man who kills all fish today
Founder Member
Kilkeel SAC

Don't need it! Put it back alive
dtmcc
SAI Bait Ball
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Kilkeel, Co. Down
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time

Postby Leon Roskilly » Fri Jul 22, 2005 9:58 am

This is the email that SACN sent out to it's membership:

To all SACN Members,

No doubt many of you are aware of the furore that has grown following the story published in last week’s Fishing News of plans to develop a commercial tope fishery in the UK.

Briefly, a fish merchant in Lowestoft has a market into which it can sell large tope, and wants to create a market for the smaller tope, as well as being able to supply the lucrative far eastern markets for shark fins.

Having created the market, they expect vessels from around the UK (as well as Lowestoft based long-liners) to supply them with fish, many changing over to long-lining.

With tope being such a long-lived species, slow to grow and with limited reproduction, the recreational tope fishery in the UK (which supports the livelihoods of many charter skippers and their families) could be wiped out in a very short space of time.

It is expected that such a fishery would be fished out in a very short time, before those that would have made some significant profit from the new market would need to move back onto other species.

Following a collapse of the large tope population, along with the smaller fish, it could be 30 years or more before a significant population of large tope could be recovered in UK waters, assuming that they were then protected from further exploitation.

Further details of the plan to establish the market and create the fishery are at:

[url]http://www.anglers-net.co.uk/sacn/latest/index.php?view=326[/url]

(Please keep an eye on SACN Latest as we intend to update this story with details as they emerge and to post other items regarding developments.)


This can’t be right!

Tope are featured on the IUCN ‘Red List’

See: [url]http://www.redlist.org/search/details.php?species=39352[/url]

Tope have been given the highest rating of 5 (should be left alone, not eaten) by the Marine Conservation Society.

See: [url]http://www.fishonline.org/search/simple/?fish_id=110&q=tope&search=Search[/url]

The UK has a National Shark Plan (but not the EU), this proposal goes against that plan.

See: [url]http://www.jncc.gov.uk/page-3145-theme=default[/url]

And: [url]http://www.jncc.gov.uk/pdf/jncc360.pdf[/url]

The EU and the UK government have agreed to move to an ‘ecology-based’ fishery management regime. (Destroying the population of an apex predator is anything but ecology-based management!)

The UK government is moving towards recognising the value of Recreational Sea Angling and re-designation of those species popular with anglers, particularly those of limited commercial value.

The UK/EU governments are beginning to look at the need for an Impact Assessment before any significant innovation is introduced by the fishing industry. This proposal would almost certainly fail such an assessment on the basis of the harm that would occur to the UK tope population, the overall marine ecology and to the valuable Recreational Sea Angling Sector.

(So incredulous have some anglers been on hearing of these proposals, they are convinced that this story must be some kind of ‘wind-up’, or a devious plan to lessen the fervour of RSA campaigners by, having stirred the debate on tope, offering us a concession in the belief that we might then go back to sleep)


So, how come anyone can even think of developing such a fishery?

There has been an awakening, not only to the damage that an increasingly catch efficient fishing industry can (and is) doing to the marine environment, and to the fish stocks that live there, but also to the need to take effective action.

However, that need to take action is a slow process and is working against centuries of practices and rules and regulations largely formed when the sea’s wealth was considered inexhaustible.

And change to culture and mind-sets is needed from top to bottom, to effect necessary changes. People have difficulty in believing that things are changing, especially when they don’t personally agree with the need for change, or see their own interests, and the interests of those they work with, threatened (even if the longer term threat of refusing to change is more devastating than continuing as now).

A company has a market for a product, those that are able to supply that market have a right to take whatever they can from the sea, subject to quota etc (because tope are of limited commercial interest, there is no quota or regulation of the catching of the species, so if they have a market fishermen have the right to take whatever they can).

What can be done?

Even assuming a political will to do something at a high level, it would seem that fishery rules have yet to catch up with 21st century thinking on the need to conserve our natural resources and remain grounded in the overriding need to protect the profits of fishermen, ignoring the many livelihoods of angling charter skippers dependent on the market for catch and release fishing for the species.

So, it would seem that in the short term, there is little that can be done in the way of providing some form of legal restraint.

However, that is not to say that an effective campaign will not make the proposers of this plan think twice about going forward with it, if they and those who regulate them can be made aware of the need to maintain public support for their business interests and the wider interests of the commercial fishing industry.

And Sea Fisheries Committees have the ability to introduce byelaws for conservation purposes, if they have the will to do so to protect such a valuable resource from destructive exploitation.

(Imagine, if we could get just 10,000 of the acknowledged more than 1 million UK sea anglers to turn up at their business premises, and at the next meeting of the Sea Fisheries Committee for the area!).

In the longer term, we must continue to press for tope and other such vulnerable species to be re-designated as a sports fish only, in line with the recommendations of the governments ‘Net Benefits’ report.

What is SACN doing?

So far, we have been concentrating on informing as many anglers and concerned environmental organisations as possible about these proposals, and what they would mean for the future of the UK tope populations if proceeded with.

At the same time, we have been gathering information and making this widely available.

In the near future we will be writing to Mullender’s, the local sea fisheries committee, DEFRA, and the EU with our concerns.

(The NFSA Conservation Group have issued a press release, written letters and a number of Conservation organisations have also become involved)

It has been proposed that anglers interested in fishing for the small shark species (tope, smoothounds, spurdog etc) should form a society aimed at developing the recreational fishery for these species, and campaigning strongly for their conservation, along the lines of the work that the Bass Anglers’ Sportfishing Society (BASS) does so brilliantly for bass, and the National Mullet Club (NMC) does for mullet. A relatively few anglers that are deeply passionate about a particular species can do far more than any generalist organisation such as SACN, the NFSA etc (although strong partnerships deliver a framework of support and effective lobbying).

(Both BASS & the NMC are not only involved in conservation of their beloved species, but also develop the social side, publishing magazines and educational material, holding fish-ins, forming local groups etc., all part of a vital picture).

There is no stronger protection for a species than to show that its continued widespread availability has a significant social and economic value to a largely non-destructive recreational sector. For a number of species, in different parts of the world, this has tipped the balance between the species flourishing or the species being in great danger.

Ian Burret, the SACN Regional Co-ordinator for Scotland has expressed interest in forming such a group, so anyone who may want to get involved should contact him at

i.burrett@tesco.net


What can we do as individuals?

- Well, firstly those of you who belong to environmental organisations, or even know of those that may be interested (eg local Wild Life Trusts etc) should ensure that they know of the issues and that you are concerned to see them pursued.

- Support the Bite-Back campaign at [url]http://www.bite-back.com/[/url]

- Contact Mullender’s and try to convince them why this isn’t such a good idea for their long term business or the industry as a whole.


Mullender W.E.T. Ltd.
No.3 Hall Trawl Market
Lowestoft
Suffolk
Tel: 01502 572944


- Write to the Sea Fisheries Committee for Lowestoft (there are two members of SACN who have now been appointed to that SFC!)

Mat Manders
Clerk & Chief Fishery Officer
Eastern SFC
6 North Lynn Business Village
Bergen Way
King's Lynn
Norfolk PE30 2JG

- Write to DEFRA, the EU fisheries, maybe the Prime Minster (Contact Details for all of these and others are available on the SACN webpage under the ‘Contacts’ columns at [url]http://www.anglers-net.co.uk/sacn[/url]

- Keep SACN informed of anything that you know of and of any responses that you get.

(Expect the explanation that they are only trying to provide a market for by-caught fish that are only thrown back dead now. If they develop this market, as they have said they intend to do, tope will be specifically targeted, you can be sure of that.

Another explanation that might be offered is that ‘conservationists’ are arguing that one way of relieving pressure on currently hard-fished stocks is to develop the market for non-traditional species to ‘spread the load’. Having hammered some species to extinction, it is no solution to move onto other species, especially species so valuable to another more valuable sector that does not involve a high mortality, and to the ecosystem as a whole, and especially species so vulnerable to exploitation with such very poor capacity for recovery)

[url]Where to now?[/url]

Even if this turns out to have been something of a ‘storm-in-a-teacup’, it really does forcefully illustrate just how vulnerable many of our valuable recreational species currently are to the whims of the commercial industry, seeking to move onto new possibly non-regulated and non-quota species to make up the shortfall in their profits caused by restrictions imposed on other species and by increasing area closures.

Already, with fears over re-designation growing amongst commercial fishermen, there is a move by some to make the most of what is available, whilst they still can, and to establish a track record in those species to bargain with.

It’s becoming increasingly important that anglers move forward the various campaigns to protect those species as fast as is possible, and that means anglers coming forward to support their representative organisations as much as possible, before it becomes too late.

Please forward this information to anyone you think may want to assist, and those clubs, federations etc who are members of SACN, should make sure that their members are aware of the issues that need to be addressed.
Leon Roskilly
SAI Bait Ball
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:52 am
Location: Medway Towns, Kent, England
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time

Postby dingbat » Mon Jul 25, 2005 9:21 pm

It doe's not surprise me all trawler skippers can see is the day and not any further. At one time in Lough Swill they used to take in dead tope during the Tope festival. They would be piled up on the pier. Now they are releases,but there are very few tope to release
dingbat
dingbat
SAI Bait Ball
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:00 pm
Location: Ballyshannon.Co. Donegal
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time

Postby x » Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:43 pm

I sent the follwing to DEFRA. Just because this is not happening right in my back yard is no reason in this case to ignore it, as the content of the letter makes clear (I hope).

Anyone interested in tope fishing or conservation might consider doing the same.

mailto:sfiadmin@defra.gsi.gov.uk


Dear Sir/Madam,

You may already be aware that the organisation detailed below intends
to commence a commercial fishery for tope to satisfy the demands of
Far Eastern markets for shark fin.

This will in all probability soon lead to a demise of this species,
given it's slow growth rate, late maturity and low fecundity. These
sharks are already considered to be 'most vulnerable' by the Marine
Conservation Society.

All published research on tope supports this outcome, given the rapid
collapse of other shark stocks once they were perceived to be
commercially viable. Indeed, the shortage of suitable shark in the
Far East due to commercial fishing pressure is the driving force
behind this ill-advised venture. It is provenly unsustainable.

This proposed fishery has already caused outrage among recreational
sea anglers in the UK, and given that the tope population in the
North-East Atlantic is a closed population, commercial fishing in the
UK will in all probability affect the tope population and by extension
recreational sea anglers in Ireland.

On their behalf, I implore you to bring pressure to bear to prevent
this fishery or at least suspend it until a suitable impact study has
been comissioned, reviewed and published.

You may contact the company at the address below.


Mr Trevor Page
Mullender W.E.T. Ltd.
No.3 Hall Trawl Market
Lowestoft
Suffolk
Tel: 01502 572944


Thanking you in advance for your attention,


Signature...
x
 

Postby x » Thu Aug 11, 2005 1:26 pm

Here's a bit of hard info, with graphics, on the migration of tope from Irish to UK waters, and beyond.

http://www.cfb.ie/fisheries_research/tagging/tope.htm

Presumably this migration works two ways, so if tope are fished commercially in the UK and elsewhere in European waters, sooner or later we'll feel the pinch here.

The latest word I have heard is that Mullender W.E.T. Ltd., who planned to commercially exploit tope, have decided not to go ahead with their venture at this time.

This is not to say that this company or indeed others will not try this fishery in the future.

Who said that the price of peace was eternal vigilance? True...
x
 

Postby Tim » Fri Sep 02, 2005 7:24 pm

I've just had a reply to a personal letter I sent to Trevor Page of W.E.T. Mullender, which confirms what's been posted by Sandman.

It said "You can rest assured that despite reports in the newspapers that are incorrect, I have no intention of diminishing stocks of tope or any other shark caught in our waters"

Good for him and decent enough to reply.

For the record, he only processes fish and is not a fisherman.

Tim
User avatar
Tim
SAI Bait Ball
 
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time

Postby Leon Roskilly » Sat Sep 03, 2005 9:18 am

Sandman wrote:This is not to say that this company or indeed others will not try this fishery in the future.

Who said that the price of peace was eternal vigilance? True...



Seems that idea has struck a chord and a new society aimed at protecting our recreational shark species is about to lift off.

see:

http://www.anglersnet.co.uk/ubb/ultimat ... 2;t=005741

Tight Lines - leon
Leon Roskilly
SAI Bait Ball
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:52 am
Location: Medway Towns, Kent, England
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time

Postby x » Fri Sep 09, 2005 3:07 pm

Like I said earlier, some other bludger was likely to take on the idea of exploiting tope - see article below.

It appears that now another processor, Mr. Sam Cole, has bought the original processing equipment and intends to process tope by-catches - begging the question; if a fish develops a commercial value and use and is not dumped at sea alive or dead, is it not a 'commercial' species - being commercially exploited?

Should the focus of the fishing industry not be to avoid by-catch where possible, rather than turn by-catch into another commercial enterprise?

Is it not as bad to create or perpetuate a market in an endangered species as it is to actively hunt them? Has the commercial fishing industry at large reduced itself to the position of having to fly in the face of public opinion by preying on a small and unsustainable stock?

And after this, which species is next?


BY LYNETTE ALCOCK

08 September 2005 16:09

A Lowestoft fisherman has given up his battle to promote a type of shark as the ?new cod? after catches of the fish were found to be too small to make the business feasible.

Trevor Page made the national headlines in June after the EDP revealed his plans to catch tope, a member of the shark family, and create a market for it in the UK.

Mr Page also believed that the fins would be a lucrative source of income in the Far East where they are a highly prized ingredient of shark fin soup.

But conservation groups and fishing bodies were furious at the plans which they claimed could wipe out populations of the slow-growing fish.

Today, a spokesman for Mullender's, which was believed to be connected with Mr Page in the scheme said: ?Mr Page does not work for us and he's not here. The reason tope is not being fished is because there is not enough of them being landed and not enough of a market for it.

?Today we took just two, one large and one small. There are a lot of spotted leopard type but they have a very small fin and again there is no real market for them.?

Mr Page was unavailable for comment. However, Lowestoft-based Sam Cole Food Group which has taken on the tope processing equipment Mr Page was using, said it had no plans to continue the venture.

Owner, Sam Cole, said: ?We do buy the product off the fish market and we will use the equipment to process these fish as we always have, but we have no plans to try and fish tope.

?The main reason Trevor decided to call it a day was because there was simply not the quantities of it. Also the conservationists were up in arms about it. Fishing tope is not economically viable, that's the bottom line.?

Tope is present off the east coast of Britain from June until October, can grow up to 2m long and weigh 100lbs. But like many sharks it is slow-growing therefore extremely vulnerable to fishing at unsustainable rates.

When Mr Page's plans were announced in June, they were immediately condemned by Richard Ferre of the National Federation of Sea Anglers (NFSA).

He said killing large numbers of tope would upset the UK's recreational sea angling industry as it was one of the few large fish left in British waters to attract sport fisherman.

?There will be a quick killing and the stocks ruined,? he said. ?This sort of behaviour is why our fish stocks are a shadow of what they were.?
x
 

Postby Leon Roskilly » Mon Oct 03, 2005 5:38 pm

And now today's The Times :)

[url]http://www.anglers-net.co.uk/sacn/latest/index.php?view=399[/url]


Tight Lines - leon
Leon Roskilly
SAI Bait Ball
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:52 am
Location: Medway Towns, Kent, England
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time


Return to Angling News, Issues, Comments and Opinions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], SemrushBot [Bot] and 0 guests