by x » Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:53 pm
"Not much chance of people copping on and adopting conservation if the tabloids keep branding any shark a ""man-eater"". That shark probably took decades to reach that size, without eating any men.
The realists among us know fine even a mullet would be a man-eater if you were floating face down on their patch for long enough.
I think to earn the name man-eater you should have to (as a shark etc) leave the water, with the active intention of having homo sapiens as you main course, and actually eat a whole man. just eating a swimmer in the water doesn't count - no effort.
I wouldn't mind, but the same publication would be the first to be in your face if you were seen eating non-dolphin friendly tuna. There's a word for that...."