Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:00 pm
Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:07 pm
Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:36 pm
Jim from Cork wrote:Rapala:and heres the real sad bit - a peice of paper from some blokes in suits.Because in my opinion catching a ruck of big bass like these is a great achievement in itself and if you are confident in your methods, and appreciative of the true value in angling terms of what you have achieved, you shouldnt need someone on a committee somewhere to give you a piece of paper to tell you so. But thats the specimen certification system for you - unless you are geared up for it, it goes against conservation.
Of course catching such fish is a great achievement and well done lads. What is wrong with an angler wanting to certify his fish (the only sure way of proving what was caught was caught and not a another “fishy tale”)? It is also nice to get recognition from your peers: fellow specimen captors. I’ve yet to hear somebody at the annual awards get grief that he should have released the fish if he didn’t do so.
There are many of us that are geared up for the system and are happy with it. You don’t even need a camera to claim a specimen bass; a measuring tape and a certified scale are all that’s required. The ISFC is a reputable body, and a voluntary body to boot. In fact, on your side of the pond the IFSC model has been copied. The IFSC’s system, while not perfect, is constantly evolving to enable anglers release fish if they so want to. On the marine list of nearly 70 species the actual body is required for around 20 and these are for species where identification can be difficult eg. the two species of garfish. The IFSC has such a good reputation because of their rigid rules/policies.
As for the “suits”, last year I met one Eamonn de Buitleir, a man I have tremendous admiration for and was delighted to be able to have a chat with an Irish icon. I doubt I would have had the chance to meet the man other than for the IFSC.
You are entitled to your opinion and fair play to you for having it, but please do not express it in such a way as to belittle my efforts and the efforts of other committed anglers.
Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:49 pm
Cazbass wrote:Nice to see you back rapala,,
first post , like myself the mods got you,,
is that passion or what
Sat Oct 20, 2007 12:46 am
and heres the real sad bit - a peice of paper from some blokes in suits.
The point I'm making is that in my opinion to kill big fish in order to gain recognition from your specimen hunting peers or whoever is an archaic practice.
As for your comment about never seeing anyone at the ceremonies getting grief about killing a big bass well for me that sums up the mentality of the awards thing - like this comment or not, killing big bass goes against conservation - if we all killed all the big bass we caught in order to claim a badge there would be a lot less left out there for others to catch, the bass fishing would be worse for everyone and thats a fact.
Pics of dead UK bass might sadden me, but I despair at pics of dead Irish ones like at the top of this thread because you guys are so lucky having a resource recognised as being so special it is given protection
Sat Oct 20, 2007 12:50 am
Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:04 am
Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:58 pm
Jim from Cork wrote:and heres the real sad bit - a peice of paper from some blokes in suits.
How is this not a slight against the IFSC and people who want the certification of a specimen fish?The point I'm making is that in my opinion to kill big fish in order to gain recognition from your specimen hunting peers or whoever is an archaic practice.
Yes it must be. I think they are going to cancel the report this year!As for your comment about never seeing anyone at the ceremonies getting grief about killing a big bass well for me that sums up the mentality of the awards thing - like this comment or not, killing big bass goes against conservation - if we all killed all the big bass we caught in order to claim a badge there would be a lot less left out there for others to catch, the bass fishing would be worse for everyone and thats a fact.
I never mentioned bass specifically as I have never been lucky enough to catch a specimen bass. When I do I will be sure that I’m in a position to weigh and return or I’ll be damn sure of enjoying the fish when I eat it. You have seemed to miss my point that you don’t even need a camera to record a specimen bass its C&R all the way, even for a boat angler like me!
Oh wait…. I’ve actually caught loads of specimen bass but I wouldn’t claim them…. conservation you know… the pleasure…..blah blah blah blah.Pics of dead UK bass might sadden me, but I despair at pics of dead Irish ones like at the top of this thread because you guys are so lucky having a resource recognised as being so special it is given protection
Remember this: the only reason the protection is there is because of the work of dedicated people in the CFB and IFSC (against all odds and against very powerful lobby groups) did years ago. The IFSC has done more for the cause of protecting our stocks and the promotion of Irish tourism than any angling body in existence, virtual or not.
Enough of the tree hugging! If a man wants to keep his fish he’s entitled to. If a man wants to claim his fish he’s entitled to. If a man wants to release his fish he’s entitled to. If a man wants to post pictures (however poor) on line on an angling site he is entitled to. Any of these he should be free to do without people wailing and whinging about their own personal views on the rights and wrongs. If you have a problem with a post start a new thread with an opposing view!
I’ll be over in the boat angling forum if anybody is looking for me…… :)
Padge73: Sorry you are appalled :roll: … but I reckon the IFSC have been around before us and I’m sure they’ll be around when we’re pushing up daisies. You’d better never claim that elusive specimen using your online mask….I’ll be watching. :lol:
Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:51 pm
Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:19 pm
Sun Oct 21, 2007 10:18 am