Tue May 08, 2012 3:44 pm
fs if he doesnt want to tell anyone were it is then thats his choice. fs the same people would chastise you for naming the same mark. wind yer kneck in
Tue May 08, 2012 4:58 pm
yoooo stevie, you had a hard day at the gym or wat?haha..........gabbey get a pic up mate.
Tue May 08, 2012 5:11 pm
Been watching this thread for a while and feel that I should throw my penny worth into the mix. It seems to me that the simple way to resolve this issue would be if the OP would do as he said he was going to, and post the pics from his mobile, no pics equals continued disbelief by some people and to be honest the claims seem to be a little outlandish to me. If I had landed a fish of that size I would have had a few scales from him and a load of pics of him, both would have served to prove the size and age of the fish.
Regards Wez
Tue May 08, 2012 5:31 pm
haha snakewhite.. you love it..
get a picture of you up in that morph suit haha
Tue May 08, 2012 7:02 pm
round_ourway wrote:fs if he doesnt want to tell anyone were it is then thats his choice. fs the same people would chastise you for naming the same mark. wind yer kneck in
I don't think anyone was asking for a specific mark. I certainly wasn't but if you don't put anything up except i caught a big fish there is little point in a forum such as this.
The original claim of a 113cm pollack would have broken the current irish record by several pounds. According to the ISFC its one of the oldest records on the books, set in 1904. Again if you can't question a claim such as this without being accused of all sorts what is the point of this forum.
It has now been changed to a 93 cm pollack. Still one of the biggest for a long time and he has my congratulations.
Tue May 08, 2012 9:57 pm
kerrywez wrote:Been watching this thread for a while and feel that I should throw my penny worth into the mix. It seems to me that the simple way to resolve this issue would be if the OP would do as he said he was going to, and post the pics from his mobile, no pics equals continued disbelief by some people and to be honest the claims seem to be a little outlandish to me. If I had landed a fish of that size I would have had a few scales from him and a load of pics of him, both would have served to prove the size and age of the fish.
Regards Wez
I feel the same mate, if no camera, i would have brought that specimen home to take a pic.
Tue May 08, 2012 10:15 pm
I questioned a post on here a while ago from a bloke in kerry catching loads of bass in an hour or something, and it showed his "website" not a report, just an advert, and i got ticked off for it. There are people on here take the time and effort to write true honest reports, some at great length,and reasonbly accurate.Personally i just dabble at seafishing as i trout and salmon fish as well.I try my best to give accurate reports.. a lot of blanks included.
Tue May 08, 2012 11:01 pm
yngkmd wrote:Haters always be hating
dont hate the player hate the game yo
Wake up man, talk fishing!!
Tue May 08, 2012 11:11 pm
yngkmd wrote:Haters always be hating
dont hate the player hate the game yo
Know what you sayin' dog, fo shizzle, jus' b down wit da homies, respect. Ayeeeeee.
Wed May 09, 2012 8:10 am
"fo shizzle"? Is that near Mil shizzle?
Mon May 28, 2012 3:31 pm
dont want to bump up an old thread but any sign of those pics yet man ? i still have faith
Mon May 28, 2012 5:41 pm
Gibble gabble
Mon May 28, 2012 5:41 pm
Gibble gabble
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.