...and fishermen felt the Government had removed everything that was 'good' about their industry...
Like the fish, for example?
No, seriously....what exactly does 'good' mean? The right to catch all you want? Now, we all know fish stocks are well down, and by and large, set to decline further. As far as commercial fishermen are concerned, they want to be able to catch
at least what scientists tell them is the 'maximum sustainable yield' - based on what the fishermen report they land, among other factors. And MSY is the basis that European fisheries are manged under. Beat the stocks down, then keep them there.
So having hammered most stocks into the ground, they're complaining that they aren't allowed to catch more. That's like having money in the bank, continually withdrawing
all the interest, and then whinging that your capital isn't growing. Am I the only one who finds that concept laughable?
The commercial fishing industry as a whole has proven time and time again it cannot effectively regulate itself and fights tooth and nail to avoid external regulation.
The simple fact is, you cannot catch the fish and at the same time, expect them magically to reappear in the sea the next day. You cannot extract most or all the breeding fish from a population and expect it to grow. You cannot trash the environment and expect it to support the same wealth of biodiversity that it formerly did.
Commercial fishermen have now accepted that there may be other threats to fish stocks - such as global warming affecting range and recruitment and so on. In fact, these other factors now seem to have been added to the blame list, along with johnny foreigner, the CFP, evil politicians, ignorant scientists and the like.
However, they all fail to realise that regardless of what the threats are and what their effect is, fishing away as hard as you can isn't going to help.
Is that concept so difficult to understand?