Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:29 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:36 pm
JimC wrote: The Salters are excellent but the keypad tends to fail after a while. .
Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:25 pm
Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:41 am
Death of the chairman of the Specimen Fish Committee
IN A week when the Irish Specimen Fish Committee (ISFC) report for 2012 was published, came the sad news that its chairman, Trevor Champ, had died following a relatively short illness.
Trevor took over chairmanship of ISFC in 2002 and successfully steered the committee through many changes in the specimen and record categories for the report to become one of the most sought-after booklets in Irish angling.
Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:31 am
jd wrote:From
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ire ... 92061.htmlDeath of the chairman of the Specimen Fish Committee
IN A week when the Irish Specimen Fish Committee (ISFC) report for 2012 was published, came the sad news that its chairman, Trevor Champ, had died following a relatively short illness.
Trevor took over chairmanship of ISFC in 2002 and successfully steered the committee through many changes in the specimen and record categories for the report to become one of the most sought-after booklets in Irish angling.
RIP
Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:45 am
Etihad wrote:It is great to see that the ISFC have at long last decided to introduce 'length based specimens' for spurdog from 2014, as they presently do for tope and blue shark. Even they have recognised that spurdogs are critically endangered. All specimens above 12lb are almost certainly females which don't even mature until 18-21 years old. They have a gestation period of roughly 24 months which means all specimens currently caught are probably pregnant females. As things stand all specimen claims need to be weighed on land which means a needless slaughter of these fish. In all honesty I can't see why more species can't be covered by the length based method. There were 80 spurdogs on the list this year, how many were returned alive I wonder?
Mon Feb 11, 2013 1:06 pm
Mr Willie Roche,
Secretary ISFC.
Inland Fisheries Ireland,
Swords,
Co.Dublin.
Via Email
Monday, 11 February 2013
Dear Willie,
I have been tasked by numerous small boat owners and members of Sea Angling Ireland .org to write to the committee to make some enquiries about the current scales certification process.
The system as it exists is not ideal for all. Members/anglers have baulked at the prohibitive cost of certification and have also asked me to ask some questions regarding certification by other reputable companies/organisations. I know there are many anglers that have not certified their scales in 2012 and therefore have stopped claiming specimen fish.
Anglers were keen to point out that the fee of €50.00 is actually closer to €60.00 by the time an anglers sends the scales via post or courier to Dublin. I think most appreciate that there is going to be some cost involved in certification however many highlight the fact that it costs considerably less to certify a scales in Northern Ireland.
We appreciate the need for standards and the IFSC has always had high standards across the claims process however the fact that there is only one method of scales certification is frustrating many anglers especially considering that there are more cost effective methods of certification to be found locally.
Anglers point out for example:
• Calibration companies locally will certify scales for something like €20-€25.
• Many companies have internal laboratories where scales, weights and measures are regularly calibrated/certified.
• Some tackle shops are prepared to invest in a set of calibration weights.
We feel that the committee needs to investigate these options and allow anglers to have a choice in how/where they have their scales certified. If the committee decides to allow anglers to have a choice it would be necessary to have a scales test/certificate template available on line so that anglers can present this with their scales and also we would be all presenting identical certificates. Anglers are prepared to help out in any way necessary if it suits the committee.
We hope that you can bring this matter before the committee for discussion as soon as possible and revert back.
You might pass on our compliments to the committee on another splendidly produced report in 2012.
Yours sincerely,
_________________
Jim Clohessy
Mon Feb 11, 2013 1:28 pm
Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:38 pm
Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:26 am
Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:59 am
Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:51 pm
JimC wrote:Just a brief update:
I spoke with Willie Roche at the Awards.
He acknowledged the letter. The committee discussed the matter at their meeting.
They will be reviewing the situation and coming back to us.
As I said earlier, the committee tends to work slowly but we should get a result that will satisfy.
Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:35 pm
red wrote:Good work jim.
Do you think they will give an answer/guidelines before the summer? Id like to get my scales done again but wont be paying over €50 to get it done. I dont mind paying for it but im not gonna be fleeced by a government organisation just to claim a fish.
Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:49 pm
Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:16 pm