Fri Mar 22, 2013 9:54 pm
The Austrian wrote:this is the future plan of GMO salmon from a Norwegian company if they can go ahead. The end of our fishing for sure: http://www.fis.com/fis/worldnews/worldn ... +target%3D
Please sign the petition above and put a stop to the exploitation of Irish property through greedy investors and shareholders AGAIN! Why do we have such short memories? Did anyone learn from the just recent history? Please, even if you can't understand it yet - your children will! And then they will come back to you and blame you for ruining their future! SIGN THE PETITION!!! NOW, before it will be to late for good! You have been warned!
Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:22 pm
Sat Mar 23, 2013 12:16 pm
Sat Mar 23, 2013 12:39 pm
Sat Mar 23, 2013 2:10 pm
Sat Mar 23, 2013 2:30 pm
Hugo wrote:This is what the Irish Wildlife Trust has to say about the proposal:
http://iwt.ie/2012/12/iwt-opposes-plans ... alway-bay/
Sat Mar 23, 2013 2:45 pm
Sat Mar 23, 2013 3:16 pm
Sat Mar 23, 2013 5:22 pm
Sat Mar 23, 2013 10:12 pm
Sun Mar 24, 2013 3:54 pm
Sun Mar 24, 2013 6:13 pm
Sun Mar 24, 2013 9:54 pm
Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:31 pm
Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:22 pm
Hugo wrote:More online browsing has confirmed for me that the North Clare Burren is a National Park. This development will be right in front of Ballyvaughan-Doolin coastline of that national park. How did they square that one among themselves?
Also the general Galway Bay is apparently already an SAC. You can download and read the site synopsis here:
http://www.npws.ie/protectedsites/speci ... omplexsac/
Its quite short and understandable. Note what it says near the end about concerns over sewage and aquaculture.
Mon Mar 25, 2013 11:30 pm
Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:53 am
Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:26 am
corbyeire wrote:is it passed by government as an SAC or is it still only a proposed SAC or candidate SAC?
these areas can be SACs in terms of european commitments but on the ground not passed by national government
so while the deal is being done there is no real protection or policing etc
Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:11 pm
Hugo wrote:corbyeire wrote:is it passed by government as an SAC or is it still only a proposed SAC or candidate SAC?
these areas can be SACs in terms of european commitments but on the ground not passed by national government
so while the deal is being done there is no real protection or policing etc
No, it seems to be a full SAC according to the official site. Have a look yourself. Also, Inishmaan and Inishmore are protected by SACs, but not Inisheer..... makes you wonder.
On rereading the synopsis, it may be the SAC only applies east of Black Head, it's not totally clear. But even so, the tidal surge is going to carry the fish farm detritus straight into the inner bay and onto all the shore areas and habitats that are specifically protected by the SAC.
Thu Mar 28, 2013 1:06 am