Bass ban - but stay more vigilant now than ever - pleeeeease

Get down there in a group yourselves lads and picket the mark. Mob handed. Intimidate them out of it. First sign of trouble, phone the guards.

Easy for me in Donegal to say......

Seriously good idea there must be loads of lads in Wexford, Waterford only to happy to get together some day/night and get these guys arrested or just stopped. All go out on the same night check a different beach then phone each other and meet somewhere near, phone guards and bring them down to them. They are doing something like this over the coarse fishing to.

Tommy

Is there a Bass Ban sign up down at this mark?
Tell us where it is and if enough people know about the issue something may be done, why the secrecy on here, if it's an issue give the bloddy details and we try get it resolved!!!!

Is there a Bass Ban sign up down at this mark?

Yup, a few around all right.

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Is there a Bass Ban sign up down at this mark?
Tell us where it is and if enough people know about the issue something may be done, why the secrecy on here, if it's an issue give the bloddy details and we try get it resolved!!!!

Because if they give the location it will give the lurkers another poaching spot....

TBH there is to much secrecy with anglers today!.

Sounds like they already know about it. No use people complaining on here from the local area , get down to the mark in question and do it!

I must agree with the sentiment that people local to the area need to band together and protect their marks.

I'm not talking about bashing heads here, there's no place in our fight to protect bass for that sort of solution.

Even a small group of lads going down to an area that is getting fished hard by a group of takers and showing their presence would be a great help. Just point to the signs and voice your objections. Do the same thing you would do if you were on your own trying to educate a young and ignorant angler. Except this time you're doing it to people who just don't care and you're doing it safe in the protection of a group. A Violent, oppressive and angry person is less likely to strike out at a group of people. And if he/she does you then have protection. Then there's also the added bonus of witnesses!

Perhaps each and every person that witnesses illegal activity can make sure they all report it within the same hour?

I know sometimes the IFI are a bit casual and complacent but at the same time there are also some really good people that want change.
However, the complacent IFI staff can lead some people to madness, it gets very frustrating. But I believe we all must keep making the reports and retain some belief and hope.

Whether we like it or not the IFI are the organisation responsible for policing the bass stocks (with greater jurisdiction since the end of 2011) and frustrated or not we have to work with these people. Try and be happy when something is done and be grateful that it's being done. If you encounter frustration please just bite your lip and move on. Anger and resentment does nothing but ruin your relationship with the IFI and leaves your emotional and physical state a lot worse off. Just let it go.

There is going to come a time either very soon or some distance away in the future that all the calls, complaints and reports that we should be making will actually matter and will result in positive action. When that time comes we can't afford to be sitting at home in a bitter humour after giving up hope!

We all know the famous saying 'all it takes for evil to prevail is for good men to stand by and do nothing' or something like that!?

Yours hopefully,
John D.

10 lads and 3 video cameras would be enough to rattle any poacher....

Walk onto the mark and start recording everything they do and also make sure you record them driving away because that way they can be traced by their car reg.

10 lads and 3 video cameras would be enough to rattle any poacher....

Walk onto the mark and start recording everything they do and also make sure you record them driving away because that way they can be traced by their car reg.

5 lads would be more than enough. The guards might not care much of a fig for out of season bass fishng, but they'd take more of an interest in public order offences being reported to them. It would only take a couple or three cases for the message to get out to the illegal anglers.

Well, i think you guys are a bit overacting here with this thread.
Make sure you have a decent camera recording in a dark and distance. If anyone comes near me with a camera while im fishing for flounder, ray, crab, cod etc, i will nicely ask to **** off and not to film me ! Do i have these rights ?
Keep your eyes open, do what you have to do, but all this rescue mission here gets a bit ridiculous ... Really, direct your energy towards the trawlers and net anglers !
I hope you get satisfaction if you catch a fella who caught 1 mullet and you were wrong ... As in a dark they look similar ?
Also dont forget the fact that the scumbags can also record your vehicle reg and think of revenge ...

Well, i think you guys are a bit overacting here with this thread.
Make sure you have a decent camera recording in a dark and distance. If anyone comes near me with a camera while im fishing for flounder, ray, crab, cod etc, i will nicely ask to **** off and not to film me ! Do i have these rights ?
Keep your eyes open, do what you have to do, but all this rescue mission here gets a bit ridiculous ... Really, direct your energy towards the trawlers and net anglers !
I hope you get satisfaction if you catch a fella who caught 1 mullet and you were wrong ... As in a dark they look similar ?
Also dont forget the fact that the scumbags can also record your vehicle reg and think of revenge ...

Anyone has the right to film anything in public.... How do you think stars get put on telly with their knickers around their ankles..

So you think trying to stop poaching is over reacting?

As said before, LOCAL ANGLERS should be all over this.... They should be on the marks in question taking pictures as proof and then bringing it to the IFI, Im sure the IFI would be interested then because they know they have a case rather than having to try prove it without pics.

Anyone has the right to film anything in public.... How do you think stars get put on telly with their knickers around their ankles..

So you think trying to stop poaching is over reacting?

As said before, LOCAL ANGLERS should be all over this.... They should be on the marks in question taking pictures as proof and then bringing it to the IFI, Im sure the IFI would be interested then because they know they have a case rather than having to try prove it without pics.

Yes you can film whatever you want but if you going personal you have to ask a permission from the person you annoying with your camera, some research will help you here !
And then if you get some pics, so called "victim" will ask you in the court room, where are the pictures where he released the fish ? All pics are so dark so you wont recognize anyone and just making a fool out of yourself ?

What im trying to say here is that idea wont work. But reminds me the movie "Captain America"

Let the fisheries do their job what they get paid for ! No needs to become a volunteer cop and risk with who knows what ... At the end of the day theres no difference if there was 500 fish caught on 14th or 20th of may. On 14th it was just a bad tide this year if you get my point.

Well, i think you guys are a bit overacting here with this thread.
...

Why? we are all looking for a solution here and some good ideas. You seem to want to stop us doing anything and chase the trawlers? much harder!!
I'm hearing stories of hundreds of bass being taken from the coast why should you not approach these people. It doesn't have to be aggressive at all
no one wants that. Once they even know they are being watched don't you think they are gonna think twice about the next time. They are gonna be thinking maybe next time the guards may be watching.
I agree with what Kstaff says if it's a mark that is being badly hit by poaching it should be named because its already ruined anyway and the more eyes on it the better. I seen two guys a few weeks ago at a well known mark in wexford (if your in the know) and they where casing the place at low tide probably to set nets that night. One guy seem to be showing the other guy what to.
They could have been collecting seaweed but they where very interested in us watching them. If I lived down there I would have been back that night with a high beam torch or something, anything just let them knnow they are being watched!!
Time to stop typing getting annoyed
Tommy

Yes you can film whatever you want but if you going personal you have to ask a permission from the person you annoying with your camera, some research will help you here !
And then if you get some pics, so called "victim" will ask you in the court room, where are the pictures where he released the fish ? All pics are so dark so you wont recognize anyone and just making a fool out of yourself ?

What im trying to say here is that idea wont work. But reminds me the movie "Captain America"

Let the fisheries do their job what they get paid for ! No needs to become a volunteer cop and risk with who knows what ... At the end of the day theres no difference if there was 500 fish caught on 14th or 20th of may. On 14th it was just a bad tide this year if you get my point.

You would do well to do some research yourself my friend...

I can film and photograph you all day every day if I like, ONCE I do not step onto private property! without permission...

And then if you get some pics, so called "victim" will ask you in the court room, where are the pictures where he released the fish ?

I would have images of him putting them in a bag... Or else he would put them back and then there is no need for court.... If I am poaching and being filmed, I will ether return the fish or go home... Easy.

WTF has Captain America got to do with bass poaching?.... I seen the film but must have missed that part....

theres no difference if there was 500 fish caught on 14th or 20th of may. On 14th it was just a bad tide this year if you get my point.

No I don't get your point... Are you saying its ok to fish for bass during the ban because it makes not difference?

Well, i think you guys are a bit overacting here with this thread.
Make sure you have a decent camera recording in a dark and distance. If anyone comes near me with a camera while im fishing for flounder, ray, crab, cod etc, i will nicely ask to **** off and not to film me ! Do i have these rights ?
Keep your eyes open, do what you have to do, but all this rescue mission here gets a bit ridiculous ... Really, direct your energy towards the trawlers and net anglers !
I hope you get satisfaction if you catch a fella who caught 1 mullet and you were wrong ... As in a dark they look similar ?
Also dont forget the fact that the scumbags can also record your vehicle reg and think of revenge ...

I've read it all now,with an attitude like this no wonder there is so much disregard for the LAW regarding bass in this country,pure stomach churning

You would do well to do some research yourself my friend...
I can film and photograph you all day every day if I like, ONCE I do not step onto private property! without permission...
I would have images of him putting them in a bag... Or else he would put them back and then there is no need for court.... If I am poaching and being filmed, I will ether return the fish or go home... Easy.

theres no difference if there was 500 fish caught on 14th or 20th of may. On 14th it was just a bad tide this year if you get my point.

No I don't get your point... Are you saying its ok to fish for Bass during the ban because it makes not difference?

Well, first: http://goireland.about.com/od/safetyini ... _irela.htm
I bet you heard about a term which is called stalking ? Thats exactly what it is in your case ?
Oh and trust me, no one puts any bass into their bags if they know they were watched, but they can call the cops if they feel they are watched by who knows whom ! For example, i have kids with me, maybe some perv is stalking my kids ?
Secondly, what i tried to say is that the ban period is way too short, should be at least 2 months as i personally cant see any difference in case i described above. 1 day before the ban period we can take out all the spawning bass and not on the first day of the ban period.
At the end of the day, dont get me wrong, im not on the scumbags side here. Well, if you caught a bass at 11.45 pm on 14th and left the scene 3am on 15th, you were automatically a scumbag ?

Oh and trust me, no one puts any Bass into their bags if they know they were watched, but they can call the cops if they feel they are watched by who knows whom ! For example, i have kids with me, maybe some perv is stalking my kids ?
Secondly, what i tried to say is that the ban period is way too short, should be at least 2 months as i personally cant see any difference in case i described above. 1 day before the ban period we can take out all the spawning Bass and not on the first day of the ban period.
At the end of the day, dont get me wrong, im not on the scumbags side here. Well, if you caught a Bass at 11.45 pm on 14th and left the scene 3am on 15th, you were automatically a scumbag ?[/quote]

Apologies Doberman .I get where you are coming from now and totally agree with you on the timing of the ban and you make a very valid point regarding the videos and camera stuff,irony or what.

Code:

Well, first: http://goireland.about.com/od/safetyini ... _irela.htm

Stated on the first line of that site

Please take note that these are my personal interpretations of the law - if you're looking for legal advice you should contact a solicitor.

I can take photos of anyone " with-in reason " that I think is doing wrong for the evidence!
I can take a photo of any adult I want in a public area! once I do not obstruct them or cause them harm
I cannot post public photos in public of the public with out written consent
I can video on a beach if I feel the need to, I can also film ILLEGAL activity's if I wish

I studied photography for 2 years, I also worked in the movie industry as a security guard and had many dealings with photographers and quickly learned the law on photos... Please educate yourself before you start spouting crap!

I bet you heard about a term which is called stalking ? Thats exactly what it is in your case ?

Although stalking is illegal, some of the actions that can contribute to stalking are initially legal, such as gathering information, calling someone on the phone, sending gifts, emailing or instant messaging. They become illegal when they breach the legal definition of harassment e.g. an action such as sending a text is not usually illegal, but is illegal when frequently repeated to an unwilling recipient. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalking

If I want to stand on a beach taking photos or filming illegal activity's I can and will!

Oh and trust me, no one puts any Bass into their bags if they know they were watched, but they can call the cops if they feel they are watched by who knows whom !

Then by me being there I am stopping the illegal killing of Bass which is the reason Im there taking pics?

1 day before the ban period we can take out all the spawning Bass and not on the first day of the ban period.

Wrong again,, 1 day before the ban and every day before and after you can take 2 BASS BIGGER THAN 40CM.


Before you start to shoot people for trying to stop poachers please do your research, uneducated people are the problem with this country.

.................

Yes, i agree with you, you can you can you can
Will that work in court, thats another question ! With your hyper activity you may need a solicitor and CAN lose the case ... as theres no strict law in that case and a judge can be very democratic and against your views ...
Most wikipedia perceptions wont work in Irish court unfortunately.

If the law was changed from being allowed bring 1 bass rather than 2, would it be more benefical than a month of no fishing? Or what about placing a "no fish to be kept period", maybe 2 months where fishing was allowed but no bass could be kept?
Does the month make a difference, surely the taking of fish is more detrimental?
From what i understand and i am open to correction on this but the month came in originally as it was taught that this was the bass's spawning season but in fact there is no real research or data to back this up and it is more of a theory?
I know that recreational fishing for bass doesnt even touch the numbers that trawlers (be it accidental or not) and illegal netting take but as a keen bass angler i think that by dropping the number of fish a person can take and by allowing them to be fished for but not kept might be the way forward.
I am not a vigalante on this opinion so no need for anyone to jump down my throat, i totally agree with the ban and by no way am i saying it should go but i just wondered what other peoples taughts were on it?
I know its a sensitive subject with people and i have said it to people myself during the month as i always give people the benefit of the doubt, some people just need to be educated and some just need a little reminder.

Is there a similar ban/season elsewhere in NW Europe?