Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:16 pm
Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:44 pm
Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:38 am
JimH wrote:Late last year I posted regarding what I consider to have been a deterioration in the numbers of fish that I expected to catch on a day by day basis in Wexford. That deterioration was significant running at 65%. Surely a reasonable post for discussion.
At this stage of the 2012 season that deterioration has continued and worsened to the extent that anticipated versus actual returns is down by 88%.
This post is not a discussion regarding debate across techniques or learning curves or methods employed, I measure very accurately across all factors. This post is a wave of a red flag that something is not right. This may be viewed as contrary to popular belief – but it depends on what and why you want to believe I guess!
Ensure comparisons, logic and timescale are valid – one or two big fish don’t make a season.
Today was a classic example of how tough it is –fishing with Pete Browne, who is a return customer who suffered last year too, Pete is a capable fisherman and under my guidance we can make a strong team and yet Pete had an extremely difficult day today, fish yes, fish missed yes but only at extraordinary effort and with minimum returns.
Throughout this blog and for the five years of its existence I have emphasised the extent of the influences that the fishery is prone to. To a large extent those influences are hard wired into the reality of the business, this is reflected here almost daily. The essence of what you see here is a reflection of the fishing, always has been.
Understand the influences and their effects on the marine environment/fauna and you can understand a large part of the challenges of Bass fishing.
Remember ‘Bass fishing’ is easy and fun and can be done by any person – other elements create the challenges.
Last year and into this year I believed that ‘weather’ was the major reason for such a tough season during 2012 and I guess I tried to validate that. Don’t get me wrong I know what bad weather is, but this is different. I like to believe that the fish are just a short distance off, inshore in ‘suspended’ mode waiting for ‘better’ conditions. A poor growth year perhaps. Just like 1986.
But I cant help wondering at this stage is it something else. Hopefully it can turnaround.
Whatever it might be, a big thanks to all for your patience and perseverance!
Jim Hendrick
Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:09 pm
Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:12 pm
cortaz wrote:Bass numbers this year are down due solely due to the bad weather, 2010 and 2011 been my best ever, catches up by over 60%, we,e also seen huge shoals of 3/7lb fish, we wer acually wondering were they came outa, they were never there before in such numbers??
Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:42 pm
Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:59 pm
Pat wrote:If the weather settles down you may see a huge improvement. The weather in 2009 was similar, if not so bad as this year, and the fishing was a bit patchy then also. Then in Sept we had a great run of settled weather and the fishing took off!!! I'm keeping my fingers crossed for something similar this year.
Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:32 pm
RockHunter wrote:Pat wrote:If the weather settles down you may see a huge improvement. The weather in 2009 was similar, if not so bad as this year, and the fishing was a bit patchy then also. Then in Sept we had a great run of settled weather and the fishing took off!!! I'm keeping my fingers crossed for something similar this year.
Yes I remember that - I had much better results bait fishing than lure fishing over the Summer of 2009. Then at the end of August at the beginning of a period of prolonged high pressure the lure fishing really took off and was excellent for the following 6 weeks until the next big low pressure system hit the coast. Here's hoping for something similar for this year
Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:58 am
Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:42 pm
Tue Sep 18, 2012 11:04 am
JohnQ wrote:Hi Guys,
I should have got involved in this thread sooner but I've been busy. There are several points in this thread that I think need clarifying. The first is the issue of poor recruitment. In Ireland we have always had good and bad years for Bass recruitment because we are so far north. This however does not explain the fact that we are no longer catching the large numbers of smaller fish that we were a few years ago. These fish might be bigger and slightly less plentiful but should be still in evidence. Bass can live up to 28 years so the good catches we had only a few years ago should not be stopping so abruptly. Something else may have happened to them. Dr. Ed Fahy has done the most recent scientific work on Bass and his view is that the Irish stock was much more limited that some would suggest. This could mean that angling mortality coupled with illegal inshore netting could have had a major effect.
The second point is something that all Irish Bass anglers need to be aware of. EU trawlers are not catching Irish Bass in the winter months. As part of research that I did for the Irish Bass policy group it appears that Bass are extremely rare in offshore waters in the Irish and Celtic sea. The figures I received from Mike Armstrong (CEFAS) for 2010 shows that all UK trawlers caught almost no Bass in these areas for the whole year!. French statistics show that their boats also caught very few Bass in these areas. The Marine Institute has 2 mordern research vessels and in 15 years of test netting they only caught 66 Bass in Irish offshore waters out of a total of millions of other fish that were sampled. In fact off the west coast they did not catch even one.How is it then possible that Irish vessels could be catching Bass in large quantities even though in theory they have no purpose in targeting them and yet the boats from the UK and other countries that have every incentive to target and land them can catch virtually none?
The Irish commercial fishing industry realised that they have no hope of getting access to our inshore Bass stocks at the moment given that the scientific advice states that the stock is still 96% depleted. It makes much more sense for them to try and undermine the law by suggesting that EU boats are catching them in large quantities just outside our 12 mile limit while they are forced to throw them away. If it were true even I would have some sympathy for them but all the evidence shows that this is not happening. If the Irish Bass laws were changed in any way then enforcement (yes I know it is very limited) would become impossible and what would be left of the legislation would collapse. The commercial sector know this only too well.
The last point I would like to make is the understandable suggestion that Irish Bass move offshore to spawn. The limited science that we have simply does not back this up. The work done by Kennedy and Fitzmaurice found Bass eggs that only been shed a few hours previously very close inshore in several areas around Ireland from Dublin to Kerry. These eggs had most certainly not been laid any distance offshore. Irish Bass move south along the coast in the winter. It's just that in cold water they are unlikely to feed so we may not catch many of them.
Taking into account all the evidence available it appears that the Irish Bass stocks stick close to our shore and unlike other EU countries we do not have an offshore stock to back them up. This makes our stock very vulnerable and would explain why it collapsed so quickly in the 1950's and again in the 1980's with only limited commercial expliotation.
The most worrying thing about all this is that the Marine Institute is aware of all these facts (one of their own scientists was on the Bass policy group also) and yet are currently quite happy to back commercial fishermen in their attempt to change the law. This unfortunately has nothing to do with good science but all to do with the lobbying power and influence of the commercial sector!
Tue Sep 18, 2012 6:38 pm
Tue Sep 18, 2012 9:19 pm
Tue Sep 18, 2012 9:29 pm
beachbuddy wrote:Yes sd please elaborate,which part is untrue
Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:31 pm
Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:29 pm
Wed Sep 19, 2012 8:21 pm
Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:04 pm
Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:58 pm
Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:02 pm