Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:28 pm
Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:10 pm
Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:39 pm
Rampent Wreckfish wrote:Right.
I am going to start the debate roling on this one.
Fantastic fish. Catch of a lifetime. Well done to the angler.
BUT!!
A fish of this size most have some fantasic genetics.
The fish was fit enough to survive and grow to that size.
It is caught in a river that has not got a massive head of salmon.
Would it have been better for the angler to release that fish back into the river and let it reproduce rather than mount the thing on a wall so his friends can give him a clap on the back????????
Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:44 pm
Thu Oct 01, 2009 4:05 pm
Thu Oct 01, 2009 4:36 pm
Thu Oct 01, 2009 4:57 pm
Thu Oct 01, 2009 5:23 pm
Rampent Wreckfish wrote:Right.
I am going to start the debate roling on this one.
Fantastic fish. Catch of a lifetime. Well done to the angler.
BUT!!
A fish of this size most have some fantasic genetics.
The fish was fit enough to survive and grow to that size.
It is caught in a river that has not got a massive head of salmon.
Would it have been better for the angler to release that fish back into the river and let it reproduce rather than mount the thing on a wall so his friends can give him a clap on the back????????
Thu Oct 01, 2009 6:13 pm
doggie3131 wrote:Rampent Wreckfish wrote:Right.
I am going to start the debate roling on this one.
Fantastic fish. Catch of a lifetime. Well done to the angler.
BUT!!
A fish of this size most have some fantasic genetics.
The fish was fit enough to survive and grow to that size.
It is caught in a river that has not got a massive head of salmon.
Would it have been better for the angler to release that fish back into the river and let it reproduce rather than mount the thing on a wall so his friends can give him a clap on the back????????
ok couple of points here.
1: big fish,good genetics,notice its a male,(kype on bottom jaw) so its a multi year fish that will have spawned numourous times.
2: they recorded in excess of 12000 fish last year on the nore.
3:he has been fishing a catch and release river for the last three years and recieved i tag to kill one fish as a reward for the improved fish stocks.
so all in all,a fisherman that has put in considerable time and effort fishing over the last three years,and releasing all the fish he caught over this time, is not allowed to kill this one fish?this c&r debate is getting a bit rediculious!!
Thu Oct 01, 2009 6:47 pm
Thu Oct 01, 2009 6:55 pm
Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:11 pm
Thu Oct 01, 2009 11:20 pm
Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:13 am
Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:20 am
Fri Oct 02, 2009 9:19 am
Fri Oct 02, 2009 10:11 am
gfkelly1969 wrote:every time a big fish is caught the catch and release debate starts which i am sick of now,
Fri Oct 02, 2009 10:17 am
dexfab wrote:As a said earlier, I've nothing about killing a few fish for the table. It's just the stuffing of fish and this seems to apply mostly to salmon. Why?
Let's go back to the start and it would be interesting what people would say or do if it was a 19lbs sea Bass, or even that huge monkfish that was in the irish angler recently, would those anglers have killed them to stuff them. I don't think so, they might have killed them to eat them or put them back, which would be their own choice...
Rampent Wreckfish wrote:gfkelly1969 wrote:every time a big fish is caught the catch and release debate starts which i am sick of now,
Well Mister kelly I dont see anyone forcing you to read/post on these threads so if you are sick of it just ignore the debates.
I see a good debate as healthy thing. Lots of anglers fish for lots of different reasons and have many different views on all aspects of the sport. This, I think is why angling discussions are so interesting. People are not going to agree all the time.
I dont see the point in stuffing fish for the wall. It is definitly a legacy from game/pike anglers as i have rearly seen a sea fish mounted on a wall.
Fri Oct 02, 2009 10:54 am
doggie3131 wrote:dexfab wrote:As a said earlier, I've nothing about killing a few fish for the table. It's just the stuffing of fish and this seems to apply mostly to salmon. Why?
Let's go back to the start and it would be interesting what people would say or do if it was a 19lbs sea Bass, or even that huge monkfish that was in the irish angler recently, would those anglers have killed them to stuff them. I don't think so, they might have killed them to eat them or put them back, which would be their own choice...
so we kill them to eat them,he kills it to stuff it.whats the difference?the fish is dead either way!!Rampent Wreckfish wrote:gfkelly1969 wrote:every time a big fish is caught the catch and release debate starts which i am sick of now,
Well Mister kelly I dont see anyone forcing you to read/post on these threads so if you are sick of it just ignore the debates.
I see a good debate as healthy thing. Lots of anglers fish for lots of different reasons and have many different views on all aspects of the sport. This, I think is why angling discussions are so interesting. People are not going to agree all the time.
I dont see the point in stuffing fish for the wall. It is definitly a legacy from game/pike anglers as i have rearly seen a sea fish mounted on a wall.
ive seem marlin,striped marlin,even a cod stuffed,and hanging in a pub in england,so sea fishermen do it to!
Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:45 am